检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院社会学研究所
出 处:《社会学研究》2000年第5期64-81,共18页Sociological Studies
摘 要:This article aims to study the relationship between the farmers’ actual choice and the existing social structure through several recent cases of choice of property rights in villages.It emphasizes that “choice structure”is an intermedium,which connects objective structure and subjective choice.Choice of property rights is an extremely dynamic social process,in which endless interaction and construction occur between soical structure in the village and its members who have various choice strategies facing social changes.Village’s Social structure and its members’ choices are internally connected and mutually constructed.The article further discusses the constructive effect from the farmers’ initiative concern in their practice of choices,as well as the legacy and extensibility from the existing organization and institution in this process of choice of property rights.Finally the article concludes that the form of ownership is not necessarily the key to village reform,and that the real key is whether the village can continually create expectation of cooperation,and solve their internal conflicts with the cooperation.This article aims to study the relationship between the farmers' actual choice and the existing social structure through several recent cases of choice of property rights in villages.It emphasizes that “choice structure”is an intermedium,which connects objective structure and subjective choice.Choice of property rights is an extremely dynamic social process,in which endless interaction and construction occur between soical structure in the village and its members who have various choice strategies facing social changes.Village's Social structure and its members' choices are internally connected and mutually constructed.The article further discusses the constructive effect from the farmers' initiative concern in their practice of choices,as well as the legacy and extensibility from the existing organization and institution in this process of choice of property rights.Finally the article concludes that the form of ownership is not necessarily the key to village reform,and that the real key is whether the village can continually create expectation of cooperation,and solve their internal conflicts with the cooperation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117