检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱国伟[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2012年第6期106-111,共6页Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基 金:中国博士后科学基金项目"转型社会过渡型政府职能的运行机理与调整策略研究"(2012M521476)
摘 要:公共行政伦理精神的实现需要一种理性规约。公共行政范式的转换所隐含的是一种理性范式的选择,并主要表现为价值—工具;事实—价值;工具—事实的二维螺旋式发展,且重心往往偏向于一端。然而,公共行政的精神需要价值—事实—工具三种理性的融合来实现,任何的偏颇都会使公共行政研究与实践的合法性遭受质疑。只有将价值—工具—事实相融合的三维理性范式,才能使公共行政理论与实践避免理想主义、实用主义、功利主义的片面性,走出盲动、空想、自负的迷局。Accomplishing the ethical requirements of public administration (PA) necessitates a set of rules governing reasoning. A change in public administration paradigm implies a reorientation of reasoning paradigm and reveals itself in the switching back and forth between the two dimensions of value-instrument, value-fact, instrument-fact, with one part more weighted than the other. However, the spirit of PA is best accomplished through combining the triple dimensions of value, fact and instrument. Overreliance on any of the three would lead to skepticism concerning the legitimacy of researching about and practicing public administration. A threedimensional approach to reason can avoid the one-sidedness of idealism, pragmatism and utilitarianism, and overcome the predicament caused by rashness, fancy and conceit.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222