吸宫管不同清洗方法的效果对比  

Effectcomparison of different cleaning methods of uterine cavity suction tube

作　　者：莫曼莉[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省东莞市妇幼保健院,广东东莞523000

出　　处：《中国医药科学》2012年第23期168-168,170,共2页China Medicine And Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的对比吸宫管不同清洗方法的效果。方法将150件已污染的吸宫管根据清洗方法不同随机分为3组各50件,A组采用人工刷洗法,B组采用酶液浸泡加高压水枪法,C组采用酶液超声加人工刷洗加高压水枪法,对比3组清洗方法的清洁效果。结果 3组清洁效果,C组优于B组,B组优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论酶液超声加人工刷洗加高压水枪清洗法清洁吸宫管效果优良,适于临床推广应用。Objective To compare the effects of different cleaning methods of uterine cavity suction tube.Methods 150 contaminated uterine cavity suction tubes were randomly divided into 3 groups each with 50 according to different cleaning methods.A,B,C group respectively adopted artificial scrub method,enzyme solution soak combined high pressure spray method and enzyme solution ultrasound combined high pressure spray method.The cleaning results of 3 groups were compared.Results The differences of cleaning effects of the 3 groups were significant（P 0.05）.C was superior to B,and B was superior to A.Conclusion Enzyme solution ultrasound combined high pressure spray method has an excellent effect in cleaning uterine cavity suction tubes and is worth being promoted in clinical work.

关 键 词：吸宫管 清洗方法 效果 比较 

分 类 号：R197.39[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]