检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘霞[1] 邓牡红[1] 许宗仪[1] 邓芬[1] 张雯雯[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院肿瘤综合治疗科日间病区,北京100853
出 处:《国际护理学杂志》2012年第12期2219-2221,共3页international journal of nursing
摘 要:目的对植入式输液港穿刺固定方法改进的探讨。方法对87例次需行植入式输液港穿刺维护的患者随机分为两组,实验组49例次采用改进后的四指固定方法穿刺,对照组38例次采用传统三指固定法穿刺,评价两组穿刺一次成功率。结果实验组患者穿刺一次成功率高于对照组。结论四指固定法穿刺成功率显著高于三指固定法,四指固定法值得在临床推广运用。Objective To discuss the improved method of implantahle infusion port puncture fixing technique. Methods A total of 87 cases requiring implantahle infusion port puncture maintenance patients were randomly divided into two groups, 49 cases in experimen- tal group used the improved four fingers to the fixed method of puncture, 38 cases in the control group used the traditional three fingers to fixed puncture. The one - time success rate of puncture in two groups was evaluated. Results One - time success rate of puncture in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group. Conclusions The success rate of four fingers fixed puncture was significantly higher than that of three fingers fixing method. Four fingers fixation method is worth to popularize in the clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3