检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国五环工程有限公司,湖北武汉430223 [2]辽宁大唐国际阜新煤制天然气有限责任公司,辽宁阜新123000
出 处:《化肥设计》2012年第6期25-28,共4页Chemical Fertilizer Design
摘 要:介绍了煤制天然气项目的工艺流程及其甲烷化装置的反应原理;对比了分别采用Shell、KBR或Lugri煤气化技术方案时甲烷化装置的处理气量、循环量以及副产过热蒸汽产量。结果表明,在产品规模相同的情况下:①从投资角度分析,Shell方案甲烷化装置处理气量最大,但投资最高,KBR方案居中,Lugri方案最佳;②从运行成本角度分析,Shell方案副产蒸汽量最高,运行成本最低,其次是KBR方案,再次是Lugri方案。Author has introduced the process flow for project of natural gas made by coal and the reaction principle of its methanation plant;has compared the treating gas quantity, circular quantity and super heated steam production by-produced for the methanation plant in case of separately using the technical schemes of Shell, KBR or Lugri coal gasification. Result indicates that in the situation of same scale of product : ( 1 ) Analyzing from point of view of investment, the treating gas quantity is maximal for methanation plant with Shell scheme, but the investment cost is the highest, the Lugri scheme is optimum, and the KBR scheme is secondary;(2)Analyzing from point of view of operation cost, the steam production by-produced is maximal with Shell scheme, but the operation cost is lowest, the secondly with KBR scheme and the lastly with Lugri scheme.
关 键 词:煤制天然气(SNG) 甲烷化装置 处理气量 循环量 副产蒸汽 煤气化技术 Shell方案 KBR方案 Lugri方案
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157