检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫菊娥[1] 闫永亮[1] 高建民[1] 郝妮娜[1] 钱玉燕[1] 杨晓玮[1]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院卫生管理与政策研究所,西安710049
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2012年第12期8-10,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划重点项目(2008BAI65B19)
摘 要:目的:探究陕西省农村地区不同筹资方式的累进性。方法:利用微观和宏观数据,采用集中曲线、Kakwani指数等,比较不同筹资方式的累进性。结果:税收公平性较好,现金卫生支出公平性较差,新农合传统的固定数额的筹资方式不具有公平性,总卫生筹资略微累退。结论:改变新农合传统筹资方式,提高补偿水平,减少低收入人群现金卫生支出,改变累退筹资现状,逐步改善卫生筹资公平性。Objective: To explore the progressivity of health financing in rural areas of Shaanxi Province. Methods: Comparing the progressivity of all the health financing methods by using concentration curve and Kakwani indices with the macro and micro data. Results: The tax is progressive and it has vertical equity, however, the OOP is regressive and needs to be improved on vertical equity. The traditional financing method of NRCMS is strongly regressive and total health financing is also slightly regressive. Conclusion: The government should change the traditional financing method of NRCMS and improve the compensation level. Besides, it is important to reduce OOP of low-income groups to change the regressive financing methods and gradually improve the equity of health financing.
关 键 词:农村地区 卫生筹资 累进性 Kakwani指数 陕西
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.178