检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋俊荣[1]
出 处:《商业研究》2012年第12期207-211,共5页Commercial Research
摘 要:总体而言,WTO争端解决机制的报复措施在促进裁决执行方面的效果还不尽如人意,这主要缘于报复对报复国自身经济的伤害,"多边授权、单方实施"给发展中国家带来的难题,以及报复力度不够、威慑力不足。目前,WTO各方提出的改革建议主要有集体报复、加大报复力度、强化交叉报复以及金钱补偿,但是在当前DSU谈判前景尚不明朗的情况下,较为务实的做法应当是寻求WTO争端解决实践的突破和转变。For a number of reasons, retaliation measures in the WTO dispute settlement system have been criticized for being ineffective and undesirable remedy. Firstly, retaliation is self- defeating. Secondly, many small and developing countries lack sufficient power to counteract an illegal commercial behavior of more powerful countries. Thirdly, retaliation is prospective, which leaves past wrongs uncompensated. The proposals on retaliation raised by WTO members include collective retaliation, increasing the level of retaliation, reinforcing cross - retaliation and monetary compensation. Currently, the prospect of negotiations on DSU is very unclear. Therefore, to promote breakthrough and changes in WTO dispute settlement practice is more practicable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.86.27