检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚国艳[1]
出 处:《南京工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第4期7-11,共5页Journal of Nanjing Institute of Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:北京政府和南京政府分别于1919年和1934年制定《县自治法》,这两部法律在法律用语、自治事项的范围和议会选举权上的差异体现了民国时期民权观念的变迁。自治法规的差异和民权观念的变迁,既与北京政府和南京政府的自身性质有关,又与民权观念的传播和影响程度有关,还与这两个时期的民权实践有关。两部《县自治法》的对比,也说明立法是一项涉及诸多层面的系统工程,传统制度与传统文化、立法者自身的立场、观念和价值追求以及社会发展的现实状况,都会对法律内容的民主性、科学性和进步性产生重大的影响。Both Government of the Republic of China in Beijing and Government of the Republic of China in Nanjing introduced County Autonomy Law, in 1919 and 1934 respectively. The two Laws differ in legal language, the scope of autonomy items and the election right of the parliament, indicating changes in the concept of "civil liberties" during this phase. Those differ- ences and changes are related to the nature of the two governments, the extent to which concepts of civil liberties are transmit- ted, and the enforcement of civil liberties. The comparison of the two laws suggests that legislation is a systematic process in- volving multi factors and that democracy, science and advancement of a law are considerably influenced by traditional systems, traditional culture, legislators' position, concepts, and values, as well as the present situation of social development.
分 类 号:D911.02[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117