检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西大学,广西南宁530004
出 处:《桂海论丛》2012年第6期108-112,共5页Guihai Tribune
基 金:国家社科基金项目<少数民族习惯法在民族区域自治地方的运行--以广西地区民事习惯为例的实证研究>(09BFX060)的阶段性成果
摘 要:当前我国习惯法研究中充满着日益强烈的实用主义价值诉求与愈益精细的制度设想,这固然有其积极的实践意义和制度优化作用,但也存在"实用主义"倾向等诸多偏颇,制约了我国习惯法研究的深层次发展。究其原因在于大多数的习惯法研究者过于简单化地以西方的"实用主义"为依据和标准,既忽略了对"实用主义"内涵的深层理解和消化吸收,又没有把握习惯法的内在理路。为此,在今后的习惯法研究中,应结合全球化的时代背景,回到"实用主义"哲学的生成语境,从习惯法的内在理路来进行研究。Currently in the research of customary law, there are increasing appeal of pragmatism and more specified system design that has its own positive practical meaning and system optimization effect, but the preference of pragmatism and some other negative factors restrict the deeper development of customary law research, which due to the most researchers simply take the western pragmatism as the basis and standard and neglect the underlying understanding of pragmatism connotation and the inner logic of customary law. Thus, it is needed to do the future research under the globalization background and in a philosophical view to understand pragmatism, and to do an inner logic research of customary law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3