检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:农凤秋[1] 李薇[1] 陈艳玲[1] 钟顺平[1]
出 处:《中国医疗前沿》2012年第24期43-44,共2页China Healthcare Innovation
摘 要:目的评估托吡酯与丙戊酸钠在治疗小儿癫痫的疗效及安全性的差异。方法 54名癫痫患儿随机分为托吡酯治疗组(n=30)与丙戊酸钠治疗组(n=24)。托吡酯治疗组接受托吡酯治疗,剂量从每晚1次1-3mg.kg-1.d-1(最大:25mg)增加到5-9mg.kg-1.d-1,分2次;丙戊酸钠治疗组接受丙戊酸钠20mg/kg(分2次),逐渐加量,严重病例在检测血药浓度情况下,可加量至最高40mg/kg。记录住院期间的可能副作用。结果两组总有效率分别为70%、66.7%%,差异不具有统计学意义(P=0.793);不良反应发生率分别为26.67%和16.67%,差异不具有统计学意义(P=0.583)。结论治疗小儿癫痫,托吡酯与丙戊酸钠的有效性及安全性不存在明显差异。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate versus sodium valproate in children with epilepsy. Methods 54 cases children with epilepsy randomly divided into topiramate group(n=30) and sodium valproate group(n=24), Topiramate group received topiramate from 1-3·kg-1·d-1 ;(maximum: 25mg) given nightly, increased to 5-9mg·kg-1·d-1; given in 2 divided doses, Sodium valproate group was given sodium valproate 20mg/kg daily in 2 divided doses, increased gradually to 40mg/kg daily with serum valproic acid monitoring in severe cases. Suspected adverse drug reactions(ADRs) occurring during hospitalization were documented. Results The total effectiveness of topiramate group, sodium valproate group were 70%, 66.67%, no significant differences in two groups(P=0. 793). There was no significant difference in ADRs between the two groups(26.67% Vs 16.67%, P=0.583). Conclusion There is no substantial differences in efficacy and safety appear to exist when topiramate is compared with sodium valproate in treating children with epilepsy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63