一般干预和强化干预措施对血脂异常疗效的影响  

Therapeutic Effects of General Intervention and Enhanced Intervention on Dyslipidemia

作　　者：胡立珍[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南省人民医院,湖南长沙410002

出　　处：《实用预防医学》2012年第12期1846-1848,共3页Practical Preventive Medicine

基　　金：湖南省科技厅课题(项目编号:2011SK3164)

摘　　要：目的比较实施一般健康干预(即一般干预)与强化健康干预(即强化干预)后,对机关干部血脂异常治疗效果的影响。方法 2010年6-10月,采取随机抽样的方法从长沙市10家三级甲等医院中抽得1 930名机关干部,对完成体检后的血脂异常者726名实施一般干预,同样方法另外随机抽得239名机关干部,体检后对检出的104名血脂异常者实施强化干预。结果 726名血脂异常者经过一般干预后血脂达标率为11.98%,实施强化干预后104名血脂异常者血脂达标率为30.77%,两种干预后达标率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);一般干预和强化干预后血脂均值比较,TC、LDL、HDL差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论强化干预是血脂异常更有效防治措施。Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of cadres＇ dyslipidemia in Changsha after the implementation of general health intervention（called as general intervention） and enhanced health intervention（called as enhanced intervention）.Methods A total of 1,930 cadres were randomly selected from 10 first-class hospitals at grade III in Changsha from June to October 2010.Among them,726 cases with dyslipidemia received general intervention after physical examination.Meanwhile,104 cases with dyslipidemia of 239 cadres randomly selected from the above hospitals were given enhanced intervention.Results After general intervention,the standard-reaching rate of blood fat in 726 cases with dyslipidemia was 11.98%.After enhanced intervention,the standard-reaching rate of blood fat in 104 cases with dyslipidemia was 30.77%.There were statistically significant differences in the standard-reaching rates of blood fat between the two groups（P0.05）.The differences of mean values of TC,LDL and HDL in the two groups had statistical significance（P0.05）.Conclusions The enhanced intervention is a more effective way to prevent and cure dyslipidemia.

关 键 词：血脂异常 健康教育 一般干预 强化干预 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]