检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王周文[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
出 处:《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第1期78-82,共5页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
摘 要:法律解释在法律发展和司法适用中的地位已不容置疑,但是就法官的刑法解释权而言,到目前仍未在法律层面得到承认。理论上,我国的法律传统、刑法解释的思想、司法机关的职能要求及现行刑法解释体系的缺陷,无不体现出法官享有刑法解释权的合理性;实践中,此种解释已然存在于我国的司法实践中。故而赋予法官刑法解释权是可行的。Interpretation of the law has no doubt that the status of legal developments and judicial applicable, But the judge 's interpretation has not yet been recognized in the legally so far. In theory, China's legal tradition, the ideology of interpretation of criminal law, the functional requirements of the judiciary, the system flaw which interpretation of criminal law, all of that reflect the rationality of judge's power on interpretation. As for the judicial practice, the judge's interpretation already exists. So the judge have the power of interpretation of criminal law is feasible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249