南海周边有关国家在南沙群岛的策略及我国对策建议  

Spratly Islands Strategies of the Countries Bordering the South China Sea and China's Countermeasure Suggestions

作　　者：曲波[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2012年第6期58-67,共10页China Legal Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(11CFX065);教育部后期资助项目(12JHQ018)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：21世纪以来,南海周边有关国家在解决南沙群岛争端的依据、方式、思路及侵占行为方面采取了一些新的策略,我国应采取有针对性的对策来维护我国的岛屿权益。《联合国海洋法公约》并不是解决南沙群岛主权争端的依据,应依据历史事实及国际法来确认南沙群岛的主权;由于国际法院的判例对国际习惯的形成有重要的推动作用、国际海洋法法庭发表的咨询意见对我国也会产生影响,对此我国也应予以关注;南沙群岛争端只能由争端当事国解决,不能使该争端区域化及国际化;国家应制定海洋战略及明确的维权目标,积极采取行动,通过不断强化"硬实力"和"软实力"的方式来实现维护我国岛屿主权的目标。Since the beginning of the 21 st century, some relevant countries bordering the South China Sea have adopted some new strategies in solving Spratly Islands disputes from the basis, method, thought and ac- tions of occupying Spratly Islands, so China should take targeted actions to safeguard China＇s Island sovereign- ty. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is not the basis of solving the Spratly Islands sover- eignty dispute. Instead, China should identify the sovereignty of Spratly Islands according to historic facts and international law. Due to the legal precedent of international court plays an important role in forming interna- tional custom, and the advisory opinions given by International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea influence Chi- na, China therefore need to pay attention to the fact of solving island sovereignty dispute by Judicial approach. The Spratly Islands sovereignty dispute can only be solved by state party other than making the dispute regional or international. In addition, China should establish related ocean strategy, clarify sovereignty-defending tar- get, take actions actively, and achieve sovereignty-defending target by further enhancing both ＂hard power＂ and ＂soft power＂.

关 键 词：南沙群岛 领土争端 法律方法 联合国海洋法公约 

分 类 号：D823[政治法律—政治学] D993.5[政治法律—外交学]