检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱明锦[1] 夏伟[1] 徐之也[1] 刘通[1] 李岩[2] 姜巍[2] 王垂杰[2]
机构地区:[1]辽宁中医药大学,辽宁沈阳110847 [2]辽宁中医药大学附属医院,辽宁沈阳110032
出 处:《辽宁中医药大学学报》2013年第1期125-127,共3页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:分析评价应用茵栀黄颗粒与常规方案治疗新生儿病理性黄疸效果之间的差异。方法:检索1989—2012年国内发表的茵栀黄颗粒治疗新生儿病理性黄疸的相关文献,纳入研究的方法学质量采用M-Jadad质量评分标准。收集比较茵栀黄颗粒与常规治疗方案治疗新生儿病理性黄疸的随机对照试验。资料提取与分析:两人独立提取研究资料,采用Cochrane协作网提供的软件Review Manager 5.1软件进行研究资料的统计分析。结果:试验组茵栀黄颗粒与对照组常规方案在疗效方面有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:常规治疗联合茵栀黄颗粒与常规方案相比,茵桅黄颗粒中西医结合治疗新生儿病理性黄疸疗效更确切,而且安全性较高,能指导临床医生用药。Objective:Analysis and evaluation of the therapeutic difference between conventional therapy and a combination of Yinzhihuang granules and conventional therapy in the treatment of neonatal jaundice were made.Methods:The domestic published articles relating to neonatal jaundice treated with Yinzhihuang granules from 1989 to 2012 were searched.The included articles for study were under the standard for evaluation of M-Jadad.The chosen articles were randomized controlled trials(RCT).Retrieving and analyzing:two researchers collected research data independently,making statistical analysis through Review Manager 5.1 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.Results:There was significant treatment difference between the experimental group(Yinzhihuang granules and conventional therapy)and control group(conventional therapy)(P0.01).Conclusion:Yinzhihuang granules combined with conventional therapy has obvious effect and is safer in the treatment of neonatal jaundice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3