检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨晨[1] 黄海[1] 袁进[1] 石磊[1] 曾晓晖[1] 李健[1]
出 处:《药物流行病学杂志》2012年第11期555-557,共3页Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
摘 要:目的:评价艾普拉唑和雷贝拉唑治疗十二指肠溃疡的有效性、安全性和经济性。方法:259例十二指肠溃疡患者随机分为试验组129例和对照组130例,试验组予艾普拉唑肠溶片5 mg,po qd;对照组予雷贝拉唑肠溶片10 mg,po qd,疗程均为28 d;两组均采用克拉霉素片500 mg+甲硝唑片400 mg治疗,po bid,疗程7 d。结果:4周胃镜下溃疡显效率试验组92.25%,对照组为90.00%(P>0.05),不良反应发生率分别为10.08%和10.77%(P>0.05)。试验组和对照组成本分别为1739.26元和1814.79元。结论:艾普拉唑和雷贝拉唑均为治疗十二指肠溃疡的有效药物,但艾普拉唑略为经济。Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness,safety and economy of ilaprazole and rabeprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.Methods:259 cases of patients with duodenal ulcer were randomly divided into the treatment group (130) and controlled group(129).The treatment group took ilaprazole 5 mg,po qd for 28d and the controlled group, rabeprazole 10 mg,po qd.The two groups used clarithromycin tablets 500mg + metronidazole 400mg,po bid for 7 d.Results: The ulcer healing rate was 92.25%under the gastroscope examination for the treatment group 4 weeks later and 90.00%for the controlled group(P0.05 ).The incidence of adverse reactions was 10.08%and 10.77%,respectively (P0.05).The costs of the treatment group and the controlled group were 1739.26 yuan and 1 814.79 yuan.Conclusion: Ilaprazole and rabeprazole were the effective drugs in the treatment of duodenal ulcer,but ilaprazole was slightly more economical.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74