检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都经济贸易大学安全与环境工程学院
出 处:《中国安全科学学报》2012年第11期11-15,共5页China Safety Science Journal
摘 要:探讨职业中毒场所因盲目施救引发伤亡事故扩大的原因及控制对策,为企业和相关部门实施有效的安全管理提供依据。采用分析归纳方法,界定盲目施救行为。依据突发事件引发的紧急情况的特点,分析得出有限作业空间发生的中毒窒息事故属于常规突发事件。盲目施救导致伤亡扩大事故发生的主要行业和作业特性显示,安全监管的疏漏是事故发生的原因。根据社会心理学理论,对中毒人员的施救属于利他行为,盲目施救是人在应激状态下失控的冲动行为,这一行为与人对不安全行为的预期后果相关,应急知识和能力的缺乏是导致盲目施救行为发生的主要原因。根据上述研究结论,提出避免常规突发事件引发盲目施救行为的对策。The reasons and control countermeasures of casualties accident expanded by blind rescue in occupational poisoning places were explored to provide the basis for enterprises and relevant departments to implement effective safety management.The blind rescue was defined.It was concluded that poisoning and suffocation accidents in the limited working space were routine unexpected incidents,that safety regulatory omission was the cause of the accident,that rescue on poisoned persons belongs to altruistic behavior,and blind rescue was individual out-of-control impulsive behavior under the stress,this behavior was related to expected consequences of unsafe behavior,and that the lack of emergency knowledge and capacity was the main reason for coming to a blind rescue.Countermeasures to avoid routine unexpected incidents blind rescue behavior were proposed.
分 类 号:X911[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28