3种中药注射液治疗小儿上呼吸道感染疗效比较  

Effect comparison of 3 kinds of Chinese medicine injection in treatment of pediatric upper respiratory tract infection

作　　者：许正香[1] 钱宝美[1] 王艳玲[1] 林文龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省盱眙县中医院,江苏盱眙211700

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2012年第34期98-99,共2页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较热毒宁、炎琥宁、清开灵注射液治疗小儿急性上呼吸道感染的临床疗效。方法将116例急性上呼吸道感染患儿随机分为3组,所有病例均常规给予对症治疗,并发细菌感染者给予抗生素,3组在常规治疗基础上分别静脉滴注热毒宁注射液、炎琥宁注射液和清开灵注射液,观察3组总有效率、退热时间及药物不良反应。结果 3组总有效率分别为92.50%、94.59%和92.31%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在退热时间上热毒宁注射液优于其他两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中药注射液能够对小儿急性上呼吸道感染产生显著的临床效果,安全性好,热毒宁注射液退热效果更佳,值得临床上推广。Objective To compare the clinical effect of Reduning injection, Yanhuning injection and Qingkailing injection in treatment of pediatric acute upper respiratory tract infection. Methods One hundred and sixteen cases of children with acute upper respiratory tract infection were randomly divided into three groups, all cases were routinely offered symptomat- ic treatment, patients combined with bacterial infections were given antibiotics. Three groups were given Reduning injec- tion, Yanhuning injection and Qingkailing injection intravenous drip respectively on the basis of conventional treatment. Total effectiveness, defervescence time and adverse drug reaction of three groups were observed. Results Total effectiveness of three groups was 92.50%, 94.59% and 92.31% respectively, the difference was not statistically significant （P 〉 0.05）. The defervescing time of R＇eduning injection is better than the other two groups, the difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Chinese medicine injection in treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infection has significant clinical effect, good safety. Reduning injection has a better effect of defervescence, it is worth clinical promotion.

关 键 词：上呼吸道感染 热毒宁注射液 炎琥宁注射液 清开灵注射液 

分 类 号：R254[医药卫生—中医内科学]