投射理论和批评话语分析视野下的模糊语言——以访谈节目中的间接缓和型模糊限制语为例  

Plausibility Shields in English Interviews from the Perspectives of Projection Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis

作　　者：蒋跃[1] 冯雪青[2] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学外国语学院,陕西西安710049 [2]西安交通大学城市学院外语系,陕西西安710049

出　　处：《英语研究》2012年第4期1-8,共8页English Studies

摘　　要：模糊限制语广见于话语活动,然而,模糊限制语是否服务于话语者意识形态的需要且表现其意识形态呢?它是否有助于话语活动双方构建各自的话语权势关系?为搞清上述问题,本文以投射理论和批评话语分析为指导,采集了10篇英美政界人物的英文访谈文本作为语料,从上述两个角度进行分类,对比分析采访中采访者与被采访者使用间接缓和型模糊限制语的情况。研究结果发现,采访双方在间接缓和语的使用量和类型上都有一定的区别,这说明对话双方通过使用不同类型的间接缓和模糊限制语来表述各自的立场、意识形态,并直接或间接地构建各自在对话中的权势地位。In order to investigate whether hedging in English interviews is ideology-driven and reflects both parties＇ ideology respectively,and thus in turn helps build power relationships between interviewers and interviewees.Transcripts of ten English interviews from well-known television programs were selected for the study.By a contrastive analysis based on systemic and functional projection theory and critical discourse analysis,this present study shows that both sides of interviews tend to use different amounts and types of attribution shields to influence or orient each other＇s ideology and in turn build power relationships between them in the interview discourse,directly or indirectly.

关 键 词：投射理论 批评性话语分析 间接缓和型模糊限制语 权势关系 意识形态 

分 类 号：H313[语言文字—英语]