检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大庆师范学院法学院
出 处:《知识产权》2012年第12期67-70,共4页Intellectual Property
基 金:黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目《中国特色知识产权法律救济制度研究》(项目编号11E141)阶段性研究成果
摘 要:我国专利法坚持专利侵权赔偿适用补偿性赔偿原则,由于很难精确计算侵权人所得和被侵权人所受到的损失,所以补偿性赔偿原则不足以遏制专利侵权行为。将补偿性赔偿原则与惩罚性赔偿原则并用,特别是利用惩罚性赔偿原则对侵权者进行教育、警示和震慑,在一定程度上减少专利侵权行为,使维权成本下降,知识产权保护状况进一步改善,这也符合《国家知识产权战略纲要》的指导思想。如果我国承认惩罚性赔偿原则,须明确在适用条件上仅限于恶意侵权人。The patent law of China insists on applying the compensatory damage principle to patent tort compensation. However, the difficulty of calculating the accurate gains of infringer and loss of the infringed indicates the fact that, the compensatory damage principle is insufficient to prevent patent infringement. In order to impede patent infringement to a certain extent, reduce the cost of preserving rights and enhance the situation of intellectual property protection, both the compensatory damage principle and the punitive compensation principle should be used and the impact of punitive compensation principle on infringers should be considered. This complys with the guidelines of the "Outline of National Intellectual Property Strategy" as well. The conditions should be restricted to malicious infringers if China admits punitive compensation principle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151