检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐珊[1] 汪受传[1] 李江全[1] 陈秀珍 徐玲 白凌军
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学中医儿科研究所,南京210029 [2]南京中医药大学附属医院江苏省中医院,南京210029 [3]盐城市中医院,盐城224001 [4]镇江市中医院,镇江212000
出 处:《中华中医药杂志》2013年第1期275-277,共3页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:国家中医药管理局中医药科学技术研究专项课题(No.2009ZL25)~~
摘 要:目的:客观评价推拿治疗小儿泄泻伤食证的疗效优势。方法:采用多中心、分层区组随机、平行对照临床研究方法。由3个中心协作完成小儿急性泄泻伤食证111例,包括试验组(推拿治疗)80例、对照组(思密达和培菲康治疗)31例。袪除脱落病例后,试验组76例、对照组30例。结果:治疗2个疗程(6d)后统计,试验组疗效显著优于对照组(P<0.01)。试验组在主症(大便次数、质地、性状、质量)的恢复正常时间方面显著早于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:推拿辨证疗法治疗小儿泄泻伤食证疗效优于西药(思密达+培菲康),且起效时间较早。Objective: To evaluate curative effect of tuina treatment objectively on children with diarrhea due to food damage.Methods: Multi-center,stratified randomization and concurrent control methods were adopted.111 cases with food damage syndrome were observed in three centers.Except for 4 amotic cases in the test group and 1 amotic case in the control group,there were 76 cases in the test group and 30 cases in the control group totally.Results: The total effect after one treatment course in the test group was significantly better than that in the control group(P0.01).There were statistically significant difference in recovery of dominant symptoms between two groups and the effect of test group was much earlier than that in control group(P0.01).Conclusion: Tuina therapy is effective for children's diarrhea with food damage syndrome,which is better and has earlier effect than western medicine(Smectite and Bifico) and should be popularized in clinic.
关 键 词:伤食泻 推拿 多中心随机对照 生存分析 临床研究、
分 类 号:R272[医药卫生—中医儿科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28