检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦志强[1] 冯婷[1] 许静[1] 祝红庆[1] 鲍子平[1] 李华忠[2] 李石柱[1]
机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所、卫生部寄生虫病原与媒介生物学重点实验室,世界卫生组织疟疾、血吸虫病和丝虫病合作中心,上海200025 [2]中国疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》2012年第6期714-715,共2页Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control
基 金:国家重大科技专项(2008ZX100042011)
摘 要:目的了解湖南、湖北省省部联动县级血防机构专业技术人员的血清免疫筛查检测能力。方法考核湖南、湖北2省竞赛选手制作标准血清标本,间接血凝试验(IHA)的操作技能;制定统一评分细则与标准,分析检测人员操作规范性、IHA定性和定量结果判读得分情况,并对2省检测人员成绩进行比较分析。结果2省检测人员IHA检测技术成绩无差异,总体成绩均值较好,操作规范性和定性结果判读2方面得分均值较高,但定量结果判读得分均较低;不同性别、职称及年龄的参赛选手之间成绩差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论省部联动县级技术人员IHA定量结果判读能力均较弱,检测技能培训仍需加强。Objective To understand the indirect hemagglutination test capabilities of personnel from the institutes of schistosomiasis control at the basic levels in lake areas.Methods All the contestants were grouped by the operation standard,qualitative judgment,quantitative determination,and geographical location of Hunan and Hubei provinces,and their scores were statistically analyzed by SPSS 16.0 software.Results The total scores of the contestants of the two provinces were high and there was no significant difference between them.Among the professional persons,the scores of operation standard and qualitative judgment were significantly higher than those of quantitative determination.There were no significant differences among the scores grouped by the different genders,ages,professional titles and areas(all P 0.05).Conclusions The quantitative determination of indirect hemagglutination test of personnel from the institutes of schistosomiasis control at the basic levels is not very good.Therefore,the training of test capacity still should be strengthened.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.70.182