MPAIA DDIA和IHA筛查晚期血吸虫患者效果的比较  

Detecting effect comparison between MPAIA,DDIA and IHA for screening advanced schistosomiasis

作　　者：凃家林 姜昌富[2] 张友军 姚蓝[2] 尹其波 魏兰英 方正明[2] 黄进[2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉市蔡甸区血吸虫病专科医院,武汉430100 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院病原生物学系

出　　处：《中国血吸虫病防治杂志》2012年第6期729-730,共2页Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control

摘　　要：目的观察磁微粒分离酶联免疫法(MPAIA)、胶体染料试纸条(DDIA)和间接血凝试验(IHA)用于晚期血吸虫病(晚血)患者筛查的效果。方法MPAIA、DDIA和IHA分别检测224例晚血患者血清抗体,比较不同方法的阳性检出率。结果224例晚血患者MPAIA、IHA和DDIA检测的阳性率分别为67.14%、16.52%和14.29%。晚血患者血清MPAIA检测的阳性符合率均高于IHA和DDIA。结论MPAIA用于筛查晚血患者的价值高于IHA和DDIA。Objective To evaluate the effects of the magnetic particle antibody immunoassay（MPAIA）,dipstick dye immunoassay（DDIA） and indirect hemagglutination assay（IHA）,on detecting advanced schistosomiasis.Methods The sera of 224 cases of advanced schistosomiasis were detected by MPAIA,DDIA,and IHA,and the positive rates were compared.Results The positive rates of MPAIA,DDIA and IHA,were 67.14%,14.29% and 16.52%,respectively,the positive coincidence rate of MPAIA is higher than the one of IHA and DDIA.Conclusion The value of MPAIA is higher than that of DDIA or IHA in screening advanced schistosomiasis.

关 键 词：晚期血吸虫病 磁颗粒免疫分析法 胶体染料试纸条法 间接血凝法 诊断 

分 类 号：R532.21[医药卫生—内科学]