检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:习海波[1] 傅龙龙[1] 王共先[1] 冯亮[1] 刘伟鹏[1] 孙翔[1]
机构地区:[1]南昌大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,江西南昌330006
出 处:《中国内镜杂志》2012年第10期1054-1057,共4页China Journal of Endoscopy
基 金:江西省科技厅支撑项目(No.2010BSA10400);江西省教育厅课题(No.GJJ12108)
摘 要:目的探讨完全无管化微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)的有效性及安全性。方法 2010年6月~2011年8月,共有80例患者纳入临床随机对照试验研究。患者被随机分成完全无管化MPCNL组和标准MPCNL组,两组间年龄、性别及结石面积差异无显著性,具有可比性。观察手术时间、血液丢失量、术后疼痛指数、住院时间及并发症等相关指标。结果完全无管化MPCNL可减轻患者疼痛评分([5.08±1.58)VS(5.98±1.69),P=0.016],缩短患者住院时间([5.17±2.77)VS(6.68±2.74),P=0.017]。两组手术时间、血液丢失量及并发症差异无显著性。结论完全无管化MPCNL治疗特定肾结石患者是安全有效的。[Objective] To research the effectiveness and safety of totally tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL).[Methods] Eighty patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial during June 2010 to August 2011.These patients were randomized to two groups:totally tubeless MPCNL and standard MPCNL.The two groups were comparable in age,sex and stone area.Factors evaluated included operative time,postoperative pain,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,and postoperative morbidity.[Results] Compared with standard MPCNL,totally tubeless had much more advantages in postoperative pain(5.08±1.58 VS 5.98±1.69,P =0.016) and hospital stay(5.17±2.77 VS 6.68±2.74,P =0.017);While there were no difference in operative time,blood loss and postoperative morbidity.[Conclusion] Totally tubeless MPCNL can be considered as safe and effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28