完全无管化和标准微创经皮肾镜取石术的随机对照研究  被引量:11

Randomized controlled research on totally tubeless and standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:习海波[1] 傅龙龙[1] 王共先[1] 冯亮[1] 刘伟鹏[1] 孙翔[1] 

机构地区:[1]南昌大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,江西南昌330006

出  处:《中国内镜杂志》2012年第10期1054-1057,共4页China Journal of Endoscopy

基  金:江西省科技厅支撑项目(No.2010BSA10400);江西省教育厅课题(No.GJJ12108)

摘  要:目的探讨完全无管化微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)的有效性及安全性。方法 2010年6月~2011年8月,共有80例患者纳入临床随机对照试验研究。患者被随机分成完全无管化MPCNL组和标准MPCNL组,两组间年龄、性别及结石面积差异无显著性,具有可比性。观察手术时间、血液丢失量、术后疼痛指数、住院时间及并发症等相关指标。结果完全无管化MPCNL可减轻患者疼痛评分([5.08±1.58)VS(5.98±1.69),P=0.016],缩短患者住院时间([5.17±2.77)VS(6.68±2.74),P=0.017]。两组手术时间、血液丢失量及并发症差异无显著性。结论完全无管化MPCNL治疗特定肾结石患者是安全有效的。[Objective] To research the effectiveness and safety of totally tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL).[Methods] Eighty patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial during June 2010 to August 2011.These patients were randomized to two groups:totally tubeless MPCNL and standard MPCNL.The two groups were comparable in age,sex and stone area.Factors evaluated included operative time,postoperative pain,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,and postoperative morbidity.[Results] Compared with standard MPCNL,totally tubeless had much more advantages in postoperative pain(5.08±1.58 VS 5.98±1.69,P =0.016) and hospital stay(5.17±2.77 VS 6.68±2.74,P =0.017);While there were no difference in operative time,blood loss and postoperative morbidity.[Conclusion] Totally tubeless MPCNL can be considered as safe and effective.

关 键 词:完全无管化 微创经皮肾镜取石术 肾结石 临床随机对照试验 

分 类 号:R692.4[医药卫生—泌尿科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象