检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴勇智[1] 陈世伟[1] 姜黎明[1] 许春[1] 王敏[1] 刘焜[1] 陈勇杰[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第174医院泌尿外科,福建厦门361003
出 处:《临床军医杂志》2012年第6期1388-1390,共3页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
摘 要:目的观察盐酸坦洛新缓释片联合微波治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法选择临床诊断为慢性非细菌性前列腺炎患者108例,随机分为三组,治疗组应用盐酸坦洛新缓释片联合微波治疗。对照1组单纯应用盐酸坦洛新缓释片治疗,对照2组单纯应用微波治疗。结果总有效率治疗组为86.1%,对照1组为77.8%,对照2组为75%,治疗组与对照1组和对照2组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。NIH-CPSI总分治疗组与其他两组比较有明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论盐酸坦洛新缓释片联合微波治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎较单纯应用盐酸坦洛新缓释片或微波治疗效果更明显。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of tamsulosin hydrochloride sustained-release tablets combined with microwave therapy in treating nonbacteria chronic prostatitis. Methods 108 cases of prostatitis patients which were diagnosed by clinic were randomly divided into three groups,treatment group given α-receptor blockers and microwave therapy,control group Ⅰ given α-receptor blockers and control group Ⅱ was treated with microwave therapy. Results The total effective rate in treatment group was 86.1%,in control group Ⅰ was 77.8%,in control group Ⅱ was 75%,each treatment group was compared with control groupⅠand control group Ⅱ compared,the difference has statistical significance(P0.05).NIH-CPSI score of treatment group compared with the other two groups was improved obviously,the difference has statistical significance(P0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of α-receptor blockers combined with microwave therapy n treating nonbacteria chronic prostatitis is better than single α-receptor blockers or microwave therapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28