足月妊娠引产中欣普贝生与雷佛奴尔的疗效比较  

Efficacy comparison between Dinoprostone and Ethacridine on induction of labor in full-term pregnancy

作　　者：谢涛[1] 郑剑兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学附属成功医院产科,福建厦门361003

出　　处：《临床军医杂志》2012年第6期1472-1474,共3页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers

摘　　要：目的对比欣普贝生与雷佛奴尔对足月妊娠引产的疗效。方法选择37～42周宫颈条件不成熟、有引产指征孕妇90例,随机等分为三组,每组30例。A组为对照组,仅使用催产素;B组使用欣普贝生;C组使用雷佛奴尔,分别观察三组宫颈成熟情况、宫缩发动时间、胚胎排出时间。结果 B组促宫颈成熟较A、C组明显高,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.21和5.06,P<0.05);B组在宫缩发动时间、胚胎排出时间明显短于A、C组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.38和4.85,P<0.05)。结论欣普贝生在足月妊娠引产中疗效优于雷佛奴尔。Objective To compare the efficacy of Dinoprostone and Ethacridine on induction of labor in full-term pregnancy.Methods Ninety cases whose cervical conditions are immature were randomly divided into three groups.Group A as control group, were treated with oxytocin;group B were treated with Dinoprostone;group C were treated with Ethacridine.Cervical mature, time of contractions launch and the embryo discharge were observed. Results Group B were better than group A and C on cervical mature,the difference was statistically significant（χ2=4.21,5.06;P0.05）;Time of contractions launch and the embryo discharge in group B were shorter than group A and C,the difference was statistically significant（χ2=6.38,4.85;P0.05）. Conclusion The efficacy of Dinoprostone is superior to Ethacridine on induction of labor in full-term pregnancy.

关 键 词：欣普贝生 雷佛奴尔 足月妊娠 引产 

分 类 号：R719.31[医药卫生—妇产科学]