检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《计算机与数字工程》2012年第12期32-35,145,共5页Computer & Digital Engineering
摘 要:舰艇作战系统损伤评估是舰艇损伤评估的重要组成部分。舰艇作战系统损伤评估可以采用损伤树分析法,但是损伤树分析法难以精细的评估舰艇作战系统的损伤,现采用图论分析法对其进行损伤评估。图论分析法评估的步骤如下:首先,建立舰艇作战系统的作战运行模型;其次,将舰艇作战系统的作战运行模型转化为损伤评估的图论模型;再次,对图论模型进行求解。为了对比分析,最后分别运用图论分析法和损伤树分析法进行舰艇反潜模型的损伤评估。从评估结果可以得出:图论分析法的分析结果更全面、精确,更适合评估舰艇作战系统的损伤。The damage evaluation of shipboard combat system is an important part of the damage evaluation of ships.The damage tree method could be used to evaluate the damage of shipboard combat system,but achieving fine evaluation is difficult by using this method.The graph analytical Method was used to evaluate the damage of shipboard combat system.The steps of the graph analytical method are as follows.Firstly,the combat runtime modal of shipboard combat system was built.Secondly,the combat runtime modal of shipboard combat system was translated into the graph analytical modal for damage evaluation of shipboard combat system.Thirdly,the graph analytical modal was calculated.At last,the damage of the ability of underwater fights ware evaluated by the graph analytical method and the damage tree method.The experiments results reveal that the graph analytical method is more all-around,finer and fitter for evaluating the damage of shipboard combat system.
关 键 词:图论分析法 损伤树分析法 舰艇作战系统 损伤评估
分 类 号:TP391[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117