检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑英琴[1]
出 处:《东南亚南亚研究》2012年第4期11-16,90,共6页Southeast Asia & South Asian Studies
摘 要:作为现实主义与建构主义的融合,现实建构主义强调"权力"与"认同",借由"规则"相互博弈,作用于国际关系。从现实建构主义的视角,通过对东盟安全共同体建设过程的分析,可以发现,东盟的安全合作存在两条主线:一是共同的安全威胁促成了安全合作,二是规则的完善强化了战略合作。东盟在安全合作方面取得了一定成果,但离安全共同体的目标仍有相当大的距离,因为东盟的地区认同尚未克服地区权力制衡。另外,东盟在完善机制建设和提高经济相互依存度方面亦有待发展。Combined of realism and constructivism,realist-constructivism emphasizes the interactions between power and identity through norms and their influence on international relations.From the perspective of realist-constructivism,this article analyses the construction of ASEAN security community and figures out two main clues in the security cooperation of ASEAN: the containment of power system that facilitate the strategic cooperation of ASEAN and the construction of norms which promotes the cooperation.ASEAN has made achievements in security cooperation but still far away from security community.There are still lots of problems ASEAN needs to tackle,for example,to construct an effective institution as well as to strengthen the regional economic interdependence.The possible way to promote the ASEAN security community may start from the area of non-traditional security cooperation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40