检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学经贸管理学院,浙江杭州310012
出 处:《财经论丛》2013年第1期47-53,共7页Collected Essays on Finance and Economics
摘 要:本文将2003-2010年32家中外资寿险公司划分为中资老公司、中资新公司、外资老公司和外资新公司4类,运用可处理负产出的两阶段DEA模型对其效率进行了测算。研究结果表明,成立时间久、老牌的中资寿险公司在中外保险业竞争的格局下,其经营效率呈现一定的下降,但仍具备明显的比较优势,尤其体现在一阶段DEA效率。外资老公司在DEA模型一、二阶段及整体效率分析中都不及中资老公司,但新成立的中外资寿险公司间效率差距并不明显。此外,无论中资公司还是外资公司DEA二阶段效率都普遍偏低,因此提高保险资金的运用和管理水平是改善我国寿险公司效率的关键。In this paper, We divide the 32 life insurance companies into four groups, old domestic, newly-founded do- mestic, old foreign and newly-founded foreign ones, and employ a two-stage DEA model dealing with negative outputs to measure the 32 life insurers' operating efficiency from 2003 to 2010. The study shows that the domestic companies which have a long history and own old brands still have a good comparative advantage, especially in the first stage, although their efficien- cy has showed some decline faced with the serious challenge after the entry into WTO. The old foreign ones can not reach the level of former ones in the first, second and overall stages, while there is little difference among newly-founded ones. In addi- tion, special emphasis should be placed on the investment capacity so as to improve the insurers' overall efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117