体育争议解决的宪法维度——以德弗朗茨诉美国奥委会案为例  

Constitutional Settlement for Sports Disputes——Anita DeFrantz et al.v.United States Olympic Committee as an example

作　　者：唐勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江财经学院法学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期34-37,共4页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

基　　金：国家体育总局体育哲学社会科学研究课题"全民健身志愿服务法律保障研究"(资助编号:1700SS12093)阶段性成果

摘　　要：宪法可以成为调整体育关系、衡平利益、解决体育争议的法律手段。在德弗朗茨诉美国奥委会案中,法院支持美国奥委会抵制莫斯科奥运会的决议,此案例说明国家利益高于个人利益,政治考量占据主导,运动员首先是国家的公民,在特定的场域中势必需要服从于国家的意志。Constitutional law is a legal approach to adjust sports relationship, balance benefits, and settle sports dis- putes. In the case of Anita DeFrantz et al. v. United States Olympic Committee, the Court supported the decision of USOC to boycott Moscow Olympics. Seen from this example, in some sports disputes, national benefits overtop individu- al benefits, and political factors play art important role in it. Sportsmen are citizens of a certain state, so they should submit to the wiU of the state.

关 键 词：体育争议 宪法 利益 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]