从国家主导到草根需求:对“法律下乡”两种模式的分析  

From State Domination to Grassroots Demands: Two Modes of "Spreading Law to the Countryside"

作　　者：张丽琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学文法学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第2期28-33,共6页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<维护农民合法权益与维护农村社会稳定相互促进的对策研究>(12ZCC062)

摘　　要：人民公社解体以后,我国提出依法治国的方略。为了整合农村发展,国家通过立法、执法、司法、普法以及建立村民自治制度等方式大力推动"法律下乡",由此形成了"法律下乡"的国家主导模式。上世纪末至本世纪以来,由于权利意识和法律意识日益高涨,农民通过自觉学法、用法维护自身合法权益的情形在各地兴起,这一过程使国家立法透过农民的需求加快嵌入农村,调整乡村社会关系,进而构成了草根需求下的"法律下乡"模式。当前"法律下乡"模式的二元化具有重大意义。两种模式在产生原因、实现方式、具体目标、发展程度等方面存在差异,但它们在实践中相互促进、彼此衔接,同时,两种模式都有待进一步完善。China put forward the ＂rule of law＂ strategy after the disintegration of people＇s communes. As China has long vigorously promoted the ＂ spreading of law to the countryside＂ in terms of legislation, law enforcement, justice, dissemination of＇ law and the enaction of villagersJself-government for the purpose of integrating rural development, the state-dominated mode of ＂ spreading law to the countryside＂ has come into being. Since the beginning of the century, with increasing rights consciousness and legal awareness, more and more farmers have been studying and using law knowledges to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests throughout rural areas, which speeds up the spreading of national legislation in rural areas to meet the demands of farmers and adjust rural social relation. Hence, another mode of ＂spreading law to the countryside＂ is formed as a result of grassroot demands. The dualistic pattern of ＂ spreading law to the countryside＂ modes is of great significance because, in spite of differences in origin, approach, objective and degree of development, these modes can promote each other in practice. Nevertheless, both modes have limitations and need to be improved.

关 键 词：法律下乡 国家主导 草根需求 

分 类 号：DF02[政治法律—法学理论]