应对气候变化法律惩罚性措施运用趋势比较分析  

Comparative Analysis of the Trend of Punitive Measures to Climate Change

作　　者：郭冬梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第2期116-121,共6页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<中国应对气候变化法律框架研究>(10CFX062);2011年教育部文科重点基地重大项目<后京都时代中国应对全球气候变化之法律对策研究>(11JJD820019);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<温室气体排放控制法律制度研究>(11YJC820071);重庆市社科规划项目<重庆市构建碳排放交易市场法律问题研究>(2010QNFX14)的阶段性成果;中国博士后基金二等资助;江苏省博士后基金

摘　　要："气候危机"的解决已成为时下国家和政府需要着重解决的一个重大现实问题,尽管我国目前已经针对"气候危机"修订了许多法律法规,但形势仍不容乐观,资源的过度使用,碳排放量的超标问题依然非常严重,针对我国的现实情况和所处的历史背景,使用刑事手段还是民事或行政手段来纾解"气候危机"症结,其博弈问题,值得我们深思。因此,厘清三种手段的内涵,以比较法的视野,从实证层面研究中外温室气体排放减量保护模式的传承脉络及演进趋势,有利于我国为气候变化的应对选择出最优的法律保障途径。＂Climate crisis＂ has become an important practical problems need to be resolved nowadays in China, although China has been revised a lot of laws and regulations for the ＂climate crisis＂, but the situation is still not optimistic,excessive use of resources, carbon emissions superscalar issue is still very serious. Based on our country＇s realities and the historical background, the use of the means of criminal or civil or administrative means to alleviate the crux of the ＂climate crisis＂, the game problem, it is worth our serious consideration. Therefore, clarify the connotation of the three means of comparative law respectively, and from an empirical level to study inheritance context and trends of the evolution of foreign and inner greenhouse gas emission reduction protection, and choose the best legal protection pathway will help China to deal with climate change.

关 键 词：气候变化 刑事 民事 行政 相对性 

分 类 号：DF969[政治法律—国际法学]