“案结事了”:人民法院司法公信力的验算与实践  

Closing the Case and Settling up the Matter:Test and Practice of Judicial Credibility of Judicial Justice of People's Court

作　　者：宋豫[1] 李健 

机构地区：[1]重庆工商大学法学院,重庆400067 [2]重庆市第三中级人民法院,重庆408000

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第2期184-190,共7页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要："案结事了"与人民法院司法公信力关系紧密,互为因果。自从最高人民法院提出把"案结事了"作为审判工作追求的目标以来,全国各级法院积极响应,通过各种途径努力实现"案结事了"。但是,人民法院在努力实现"案结事了"过程中,无论是司法说服力的弱化、不信任司法的非理性泛化,还是司法路径的偏颇,均影响司法公信力的树立,从而阻碍了"案结事了"目标的实现。要努力实现"案结事了",惟有从提高司法公信力着手,同时走主动认同和强制认同两条道路。人民法院既要充分发挥调解柔性化解矛盾纠纷的作用,又要注重法的指引、评价、预测甚至教育等功能的发挥,在确保司法公开、公正之基础上建立司法权威,通过司法引导、确立社会规则之治。＂Closing the case and settling up the matter＂ is closely related to judicial credibility of judicial justice of People＇s court and they are reciprocal causation. Since ＂Closing the case and settling up the matter＂ was proposed as the goal for trial practice by Supreme People＇s Court, it has received an enthusiastic response from the courts at all levels nationwide. This goal has been achieved in different ways. However, in such a process, weakening of judicial conviction, irrational generalization of distrust of justice or biased judicial approach can affect building up of judicial credibility, which can inhibit attainment of the goal. In order to achieve this goal, we should set about improving judicial credibility and at the same time offer two ways： active identification and forcible identification. People＇s court should play the role of mediating a dispute to appease conflict softly, and pay attention to the functions of the laws such as guidance, appraisal and education to build up judicial authority on the basis of openness and fairness and establish the rule of law through legal guidance.

关 键 词："案结事了" 调解优先 司法公信力 规则之治 

分 类 号：DF81[政治法律—法学]