政治控制、个人取代组织与过渡年资量化——我国历史上大一统时期政府绩效评估经验、遗弊与继承之道  

Political Control, Personal Evaluation Replacing Organizational Measurement and Over-emphasizing Seniority

作　　者：尚虎平[1] 

机构地区：[1]兰州大学管理学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2013年第1期25-37,共13页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金"数据挖掘视域下我国县级政府绩效评估指标筛选研究"(项目编号:09YJC630126);国家社科基金重大项目"幸福指数导向的我国政府绩效评价体系研究"(项目编号:11&ZD057);"中国特色社会主义社会管理体系研究"(项目编号:11&ZD070)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在中央集权式前现代国家中,经济绩效的取得主要依靠政府的谋划与推动。中国经济长期居于世界前列的事实证明了我国历史上政府绩效较高的现实。按照科学管理原理,高绩效的取得离不开绩效评估的反馈控制作用。深挖史料,可以看出历史上"中国式政府绩效评估"类型是针对政府官员个人的个体评估,其评估主体来自于内部上级;不同时期的绩效评估方法都是以定量评估为主;同时,"评估类型"是流弊之源,"评估主体"、"结果应用"经验与遗弊共存,"评估成本"、"评估实施"全是教训等,对此可采取十种继承之道。In ancient China, the economy development depended heavily on the government policies. The fact that China had been in the lead in the economy in the world for a long time proved the ancient governments owned high performances. According to the scientific management principals, the performance could only be produced by evaluation measures, and the Chinese history also confirmed the rules. This paper probes into the Chinese history to find that in the Han, Tang, Song, Ming, and Qing Dynasties, the government performance evaluations takes the forms of internal evaluation, personal evaluation, seniority evaluation, but the form of organizational evaluation was neglected and caused a lot of adverse effects to be removed.

关 键 词：历史 政府绩效 个体评估 政治控制 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学] K2[政治法律—中外政治制度]