修辞方法对司法的贡献与制约  

The Contribution and Constraint of tne Rhetoric to Justice

作　　者：沈寨[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学威海校区法学院,山东威海246209

出　　处：《法学论坛》2013年第1期84-91,共8页Legal Forum

基　　金：2010年国家社会科学基金项目<法律修辞学:理论与应用研究>(10BFX007)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在寻求裁判合理性的诸多方法中,修辞具有独特的优势。它不仅注意到了人在裁判活动中的主体性作用,还通过扩展理性的边界增强了司法裁判的实践面向。此外,它还为司法价值判断提供了一套具体的技术和方案。然而,修辞方法也存在着一定的局限。一方面,它在解决司法确定性问题上存在不足,另一方面,现有的修辞理论和方案在实践中也难于保证裁判合理性的实现。修辞只能在与其他方法的互补作用中才能获得恰当的方法论地位。In many ways to seek the rationality of justice,rhetoric has a unique advantage.It is not only noted that the entity of man in the judicial activities,but also the judicial practice –oriented by extending the boundaries of reason.Furthermore,It also offers a specific set of technologies and solutions for the value judgment in justice.However,it has disadvantages in solving the problem of judicial certainty and it is difficulty for the existing rhetoric theories and proposals to guarantee the realization of the justice rationality in practice.Rhetoric is only in a complementary role with other methods to get an appropriate methodological position.

关 键 词：修辞 合理性 司法裁判 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]