检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马钰凤[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031
出 处:《河北法学》2013年第1期80-87,共8页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:《劳动合同法》实施以来,触发了一个奇特的多米诺效应,法律基于保护劳动者的立场加大了企业的用工成本,却导致许多企业出售财产、宣告解散并遣散员工,留下大批待业人员。其原因在于我国劳动立法未强制营业财产受让方继受劳动关系,从而为企业规避法律留下空间。营业受让方是否存在上述义务,两大法系有三种立法例:默示继受主义、强制继受主义和自愿继受主义。我国应建构强制继受主义,并以"营业财产人格化"作为其法理依据,以强化营业转让中的劳动者利益保护。The implementation of Labor Contract law of China trigger a special Domino effect,labor cost for enterprises is increased based on the position of legal protection of laborer,which causes many enterprises sell property,declare the dissolution and severance of employees,leaving a large number of unemployed persons.The fundamental reason is that the transferee of business property is not forced accepted labor relations.There are three kinds of legislation on this: voluntary acceding principle,implied acceding principle and compulsory acceding principle.We should use compulsory acceding principle,personification in business property decides that transferee has to success existing labor relationships between employees and transferor,and the employees have no right to resistance.This experience is worth learning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.189