检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王申[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学<法学>杂志社,上海200042
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2013年第1期43-50,共8页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基 金:2009年度国家社会科学基金项目"法官的实践理性论"的阶段性成果(项目编号:09BFX002)
摘 要:改革开放后的中国,对现代西方司法制度基本制度与理念的接纳与吸收,是一项具有创制意义的事业,但同时也包含着内在的冲突。在对现代西方司法制度与当代中国条件的这两种解读之间作出选择并非易事。现代西方司法制度诉求的宽度为中国的法治创新开拓了广阔的视野;但同时,司法制度的构成元素具有复杂性。从制度文化的视角看,一国司法制度的设立,一般都与该国法制的历史文化相关。法官制度的建构应该与普遍认同的概念理念相符,在普遍认同的概念下,中国法官制度的理念才能有所创新。中国法官制度的完善,必须通过法律制度的不断向前发展,法官理性能力的不断完善来进行。After the reform and opening to the world, China has accepted and absorbed the basic system and i- dea of the modern Western judicial system,which is a career with system creation and inner conflicts as well. It is not easy to choose between the two interpretations of modern Western judicial system and contemporary Chinese conditions. While the width of appeal of modern Western judicial system has opened a broad vision for China' s rule of law innovation, the elements in a judicial system are complex. From the perspective of the insti- tutional culture, the establishment of a country' s judicial system is generally related to its legal history and cul- ture. The construction of the judge system should agree with the accepted concept only by which can the judge system concept in China make innovations. China must perfect its judge system through continuously developing legal system and constantly improving the judge' s rational ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49