不可量物民事侵权救济制度比较研究  

Comparative study on remedy institution of civil infringement of measureless substance

作　　者：黄金菊[1] 陶恩萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]福州大学法学院,福州350002

出　　处：《沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第1期92-96,共5页Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：福建省社会科学基金重点项目(2011A018)

摘　　要：不可量物侵权与环境污染及其他民事侵权有显著区别。德国、法国、英美分别对不可量物民事侵权救济制度作了规定。与之相比,我国《物权法》第90条对相邻不可量物关系的规定存在如下缺陷:对不可量物民事侵权构成要件的规定不合理,对不可量物侵害与环境污染没有作出妥善区分,法律救济机制僵硬。针对我国在不可量物侵权方面规制的不足,取各国立法和判例之长,提出完善我国不可量物民事侵权救济制度的建议。The infringement of measureless substance has obvious difference with environmental pollution and other civil infringements. Germany, France, UK and USA promulgate institutions of civil infringement of measureless substance respectively. Comparatively, there are some drawbacks in the regulation of relation of adjacent measureless substance in Article 90 of Property Law of China： the regulation of conditions of civil infringement of measureless substance is unreasonable, the distinction between damage of measureless substance and environmental pollution is neglected, and the mechanism of legal remedy is rigid. According to the shortages of regulation of infringement of measureless substance in China, the good qualities of the experiences of legislation and prejudication of developed countries are adopted, so as to propose some suggestions of pefecting remedy institution of civil infringement of measureless substance in China.

关 键 词：物权法 不可量物 民事侵权 救济制度 构成要件 利益衡量 通常忍受限度 二元救济机制 

分 类 号：D922.69[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]