检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宫桂花[1] 何荆贵[1] 马良[2] 孟萍[1] 贾国栋[1] 杨雪[1] 邵明明[1] 何耀[3]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院南楼保健科,北京100853 [2]解放军总医院南楼临床部,北京100853 [3]解放军总医院老年医学研究所,北京100853
出 处:《中华保健医学杂志》2012年第6期463-465,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Care and Medicine
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAI86B01);军队医药卫生科研基金(10BJZ02)
摘 要:目的评价老年保健人群健康评估模式的合理性及效果。方法选取年龄≥60岁的保健对象,471例为研究组,采用课题组建立的老年保健人群健康评估指标及流程,监管4年间主要健康相关指标;390例为对照组,与研究组比较主要健康相关指标。结果两组患病知晓率无差异(P>0.05),心脑血管病的主要危险因素高血压、血脂异常、糖尿病的治疗率比较有显著差异(P<0.05),原发性高血压的控制达标率无显著差异(P>0.05),高脂血症及2型糖尿病的控制达标率有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论研究组保健对象评估指标获得良好监管,健康评估模式适合在保健群体运行,能促进健康危险因素及慢性病综合防治达标,使保健人群获得良好的健康维护。Objective To evaluate the effect of comprehensive assessment in health care in the elderly. Methods Four hundred and seventy-one elder people at the age≥60 years served as study group and 390 healthy volunteers served as control group in this study. Medical information of the 471 elder people was investigated by outpatient physician working station system. The quality indicators developed by the research team were used to assess health care quality which was compared between the two groups. Results The knowing rate to the diseases in two groups was not significantly different (P0.05). The risk factors control rate to hypertension,Hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus with medications was significantly higher in study group than that in control group (P 0.05). A significant difference of the controlled rate of blood lipid and blood glucose was observed in two groups (P 0.05). However,no significant difference was found in the controlled rate of blood pressure between study group and control group (P0.05). Conclusions The older patients obtain better health care quality under comprehensive health assessment.
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188