也谈完成性  

Also on Telicity

作　　者：程琪龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学外国语学院,上海200444

出　　处：《外语教学》2013年第1期14-18,共5页Foreign Language Education

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"论元体现构式和词汇进路的互补研究"(项目编号:11BYY112)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：诸多体貌理论常用完成性及其相关的增量题元来表述事件结构及其语法体现。但完成性是否能够决定成句与否,决定语法体现的变异,长期以来一直是一个有争议的课题。虽然完成性为小句类型、成句性以及语法体现的确定作出了贡献,但它的表述能力远不如许多语言学家所期望的。本文试图通过例子来具体表述完成性及其相关体貌理论模式的优劣。Telicity and its related incremental theme are the features many aspectual theories use to attempt at the account of event structure and its grammatical realization. Whether telicity can figure in determining grammaticality and grammatical real- ization remains for a long time a controversial issue. Although telicity makes some contribution to accounting for clause types, grammatical tense, grammaticality, and grammatical relation, its determining power is more limited than many linguists expec- ted. The present paper attempts to provide some examples to specify both advantages and disadvantages of the aspectual model and its telicity.

关 键 词：完成性 事件结构 增量题元 语法体现 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]