行业协会与政府合作治理市场的可能性及限度  

The Possibilities and Limitations of Cooperative Governance Between Industry Associations and the Government

作　　者：郭薇[1,2] 秦浩[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084 [2]中共辽宁省委党校公共管理教研部,辽宁沈阳110004

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第1期56-61,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(12CZZ052);天津市教委社会科学重大基金资助项目(2011ZD);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2012MA510473)

摘　　要：优势互补只是行业协会与政府合作治理市场的基础,并非是合作的充分必要条件。组织性质上的"二重性"使得行业协会既有与政府合作进行市场规范的可能,也有被会员企业俘获的危险。对于行业协会来说,其促进行业自律的动力首先来自于企业个体理性与行业协会集体理性的冲突。其次,企业个体理性与行业协会集体理性的冲突及行业协会的集体理性与社会公共利益的冲突又决定了行业协会在不同情况下,治理动力的程度有所不同。同时,行业协会对市场进行的治理是有限度的,不同层级、不同生发方式、不同管理形式、不同区分度的行业协会自律治理的限度也不同。Complementary advantages of industry associations and the government serve only as a premise rather than a necessary and sufficient condition for their cooperation in market regulation. Because of the ＂duality＂ of their organizational nature, industry associations may cooperate with the government to regulate the market; on the other hand, they may also be restricted by their member companies. Firstly, industry associations＇ motive forces to promote their self-regulation result from the conflicts between industry associations＇ collective rationality and their member companies＇ individual rationality. Secondly, the conflicts between industry associations＇ collective rationality and their member companies＇ individual rationality, coupled with the conflicts between industry associations＇ collective rationality and public interests, determine the degree of industry associations＇ regulation forces in different situations. At the same time, industry associations＇ governance is limited due to their varied levels, ways of generation, modes of management and differentiation degrees.

关 键 词：行业自律 行业协会 政府监管 治理 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]