检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第1期62-67,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(08JZD0018);东北大学"985工程"科技与社会(STS)哲学社会科学创新基地资助项目
摘 要:分类改革是当前我国事业单位体制改革的一个突破口,对于完善公共服务供给,形成政事分开、事企分开、管办分离的管理体制具有重要意义。以7省14市当前事业单位分类改革的38个政策文件为研究对象,对事业单位分类改革的目标、标准、类别以及配套措施等方面进行比较,分析当前各地在事业单位分类改革中各项具体政策的异同。经过比较发现阻碍当前事业单位分类改革顺利进行的因素体现在事业单位改革分类标准差距较大、事业单位改革过度市场化、配套政策不完善等方面,进而针对这些问题提出了相应的政策建议。Classification reform is a breakthrough to the current retorm tor public restitutions, and tt also plays an important role in improving the supply of public services and establishing a management system that separates politics from business, business from enterprise, and regulation from administration. This paper, taking 38 policy documents on public institution reform issued by 14 cities of 7 provinces, compares the targets, standards, categories and supporting measures of public institutions' classification reform, and analyzes the similarities and differences of specific policies among the cities and regions. The results indicate that the factors impeding the current classification reform lie in the disparity of the classification reform standards, the excessive marketization and the insufficient supporting policies. Accordingly, some policy recommendations are made as well.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31