对词体起源“宫廷说”的一点思考  

A Reflection on the “Palace Theory” of Ci's Origin

作　　者：胡元翎[1] 宋学达[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学明清文学与文化研究中心,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第1期43-47,共5页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(12BZW047);黑龙江省教育厅项目(12512227)

摘　　要：木斋《曲词发生史》以种种不俗的新见激起学界一场大讨论,同时为词体起源这一学术问题开辟了诸多新的生长点。木斋可谓第一次全面深入地研究词体起源与宫廷文化密切关联的学界第一人。略显遗憾的是在其立说过程中,似存在一种对词体起源问题过于"提纯"与过于"忽略"的倾向。Various remarkable fresh lights in MU Zhai＇s History of Quci＇s Evolution have aroused a discussion among researchers and opened up new space for the study of Ci＇ s origin. Mu Zhai is the first one who has studied deeply into the close relationship between Ci＇s origin and the palace culture. But what makes us regret is that he tends to pay too much attention to the origin of Ci, and thus ＂ignoring＂ some other factors in his theory establishment.

关 键 词：木斋 《曲词发生史》 词体起源“宫廷说” 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]