检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谷茜[1] 胡献之[1] 梁斐[1] 刘文彬[1] 邓伟[1] 董斌[2] 赵列宾[2] 庞伟明[3] 陈英耀[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海200032 [2]上海交通大学医学院,上海200025 [3]加拿大劳伦森大学乡镇和北部卫生服务研究、所北安大略省医学、院加拿大安大略省西比利市P3E2C6
出 处:《中国卫生政策研究》2012年第12期8-12,共5页Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基 金:国家自然科学基金(70973025)
摘 要:目的:分析患者对医疗机构公益性的评价,探讨医疗机构公益性评价的影响因素。方法:抽取3个省份48家医疗机构调查5760名病人,采用描述性方法分析患者的基本特征和公益性评价结果,以logistic回归方法进行多因素分析。结果:患者对公立医疗机构公益性的总体满意率为82.4%。公立医疗机构公益性评价的影响因素包括整体环境、就诊流程、就诊费用、义诊次数、适度检查、合理处方、经济困难病人先诊疗后收费、医保和自费病人平等对待、就诊医院级别和医院所在地区等。结论:患者对公立医疗机构的整体公益性评价较高。医疗机构整体环境、就医流程、服务适宜性以及公平性可作为医疗机构公益性进一步改善的切入点。Objective: This research is to analyse patients' social responsibility evaluation results of health in- stitutions and to discuss the evaluation influencing factors. Method: 5 760 patients in 48 public medical institutions were surveyed in three provinces. It described the survey samples' basic situation and the results of social responsi- bility evaluation. Logistic regression was used to analyse the influencing factors of social responsibility evaluation. Result : The main patients' satisfactory rate of social responsibility was 82. 4%. The influencing factors of social re- sponsibility evaluation were including environment, medical procedure, cost, user free services, appropriate exami- nation, reasonable prescription, diagnosis and treat without payment for poor patients, equal entitlement for patients with or without insurance, hospital level and hospital location. Conclusion: The patients' evaluation of social respon- sibility is relatively good. The environment, medical procedure, medical service appropriateness and equity could be the entry point of improving social responsibility.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249