检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴俊龙[1,2] 闫凯龙[1] 李佳颖[1] 史双双 王伟宁[1] 王龙[1] 王娓娓[1] 于建军[1]
机构地区:[1]河南农业大学烟草学院,国家烟草生理生化研究基地,河南郑州450002 [2]凉山州会理县烟草营销部,四川会理615100 [3]川渝中烟工业有限责任公司,四川成都610017
出 处:《山西农业科学》2013年第1期15-19,共5页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家烟草专卖局资助项目(110200401003)
摘 要:为改善凉山烟区推广种植品种单一的现状、优化品种布局,2011年对翠碧1号、KRK26、中烟100、云烟97、云烟99、云烟87(CK1)、红花大金元(CK2)7个品种进行小区试验,并对其生长特性、农艺学性状、经济效益和内在品质进行了比较研究。结果表明,云烟97的经济性状显著高于其他供试品种,且农艺性状表现较好,烟叶化学成分协调,抗病性好,在综合方面表现最优,可以在凉山地区进一步示范验证;云烟99和中烟100表现也较好,但综合表现略低于对照云烟87;KRK26和翠碧1号表现较差,不适合在凉山烟区推广。To improve the status that Liangshan tobacco lacking new varieties and unreasonable layout,we compared seven varieties' growth characteristics,agronomic traits,economic benefits and inherent quality by plot experiment and the varieties were Yunyan 87(CK1),Honghuadajinyuan(CK2),Cuibiyihao,Zhongyan 100,Yunyan 97,Yunyan 99,KRK26.The results were followed: Yunyan 97 showed the best performance in the economic benefits and had excellent agronomic traits,disease resistance and coordinating chemical constituents.As for comprehensive characters,Yunyan 97 was the best,which can be tested in futher research.Yuanyan 99 and Zhongyan 100 also showed good performance,but were lower than the CK1 Yunyan 87.KRK26 and Cuibiyihao showed poor performance,so they were not suitable for planting in Liangshan Prefecture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229