检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴芳玉[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院胸外科,四川成都610072
出 处:《医学信息》2013年第1期146-147,共2页Journal of Medical Information
摘 要:目的探讨全面、系统、有效的-临床护理路径对微创治疗自发性气胸患者的影响。方法将自发性气胸患者320例随机分为路径组与对照组各160例:对照组予传统的临床护理方法:路径组按制定好临床护理路经表实施护理。结果两组在住院天数、拔除胸引管时间、肺部并发症、患者满意度、健康知识达标率均有显著差异(P〈0.01)。结论路径组以临床护理路径袁为指导能有效落实优质护理效果,减少护理活动漏项,降低肺部并发症,缩短住院日数,促进患者早日康复,从而提高医疗护理质量和患者满意度。Objective To explore the comprehensive, system, effective clinical nursing path for minimally invasive treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax patients and effects of. Methods The patients with spontaneous pneumothorax in 320 cases were randomly divided into path group and control group with 160 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing Results Path group according to the formulation of clinical nursing path table of good nursing. Result Two groups in the number of hospitalization days, removal of chest tube time, pulmonary complications, patient satisfaetion, compliance rate of health knowledge were significant difference ( P〈0.01 ). Conclusion Path group to clinical nursing path table as a guide can achieve the desired effect of quality nursing care, reduce the leakage of nursing activities, reduces pulmonary complications, shorten the hospital days, promote early recovery of patients, thereby improving the medical care quality and patient satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28