父母教养方式和社会支持对中学生挫折承受力的影响研究  

The influence of parental rearing patterns and social support on frustration tolerance of middle school students

作　　者：程利娜[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西理工学院,陕西汉中723001

出　　处：《中国健康教育》2013年第1期15-18,共4页Chinese Journal of Health Education

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(12YJC880012);陕西省教育科学规划课题(SGH10134):90后学生抗挫折能力的现在及其干预对策研究

摘　　要：目的了解父母教养方式、社会支持对中学生挫折承受力的影响。方法采用父母教养方式评价量表、社会支持量表和中学生挫折承受力问卷对中学生进行了调查。结果中学生的挫折承受力水平一般,整体情况仍然不乐观;挫折承受力与父母亲的情感温暖、理解呈显著的正相关(r=0.365、0.245),与父母的惩罚严厉和父母的拒绝否认呈显著的负相关(r=-0.296、-0.278、-0.232、-0.217);挫折承受力分别与主观支持、对支持的利用度呈显著的正相关(r=0.278、0.323);父母教养方式不仅对中学生的挫折承受力产生直接的影响,还通过社会支持间接地影响中学生的挫折承受能力(χ2=746.89,P<0.05;GFI=0.92,NFI=0.94,CFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.78)。结论父母教育方式和社会支持对中学生挫折承受力的培养具有重要的影响。Objective To explore the influence of parental bearing patterns and social support on frustration toler- ance among middle school students. Methods The middle school students were investigated with frustration tolerance ques- tionnaire, EMBU scale, and social support scale. Results The frustration tolerance level of middle school students was not high. Signifieant positive correlation were found between frustration tolerance and warmth of feeling and understanding of pa- rental （r = 0. 365, 0. 245 ） , negative correlation were found with punishment of parental, rejection and denial of parental （ r = - 0. 296, - 0. 278, - 0. 232, - 0. 217）. Significant correlation was found between frustration tolerance and subjec- tive support and the usage of support （r = 0. 278, 0. 323）. Structural equation showed that parental rearing patterns could either directly affect frustration tolerance or produce indirect effects via social support （X2 = 746. 89, P 〈 0.05 ; GFI = 0.92, NFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.78）. Conclusion Paternal rearing patterns and social support affect frustra- tion tolerance.

关 键 词：中学生 挫折承受力 父母教养方式 社会支持 

分 类 号：R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] B844.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]