检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王合梅[1] 李超[1] 雍芳芳[1] 贾慧群[1]
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第四医院麻醉科,石家庄市050011
出 处:《中华麻醉学杂志》2012年第11期1374-1375,共2页Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基 金:河北省普通高等学校强势特色学科肿瘤学建设经费资助项目;河北省科技厅指令性课题(07276101D-106)
摘 要:目的探讨每搏量变异度(SVV)与单肺通气患者血容量变化的相关性。方法择期拟行食管癌切除术患者40例,男性,年龄50~60岁,体重指数20~25kg/m2,ASA分级Ⅱ级。麻醉诱导后经口明视插入F39右侧双腔支气管导管,经两肺听诊和纤维支气管镜定位后,连接麻醉机行单肺通气,设定潮气量8ml/kg、呼吸频率15次/min、吸呼比1:2。单肺通气30rain时静脉输注6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4,速率为0.67ml·kg·min^-1,分别在输注前、输注羟乙基淀粉剂量达2、4、6、8、10、12ml/kg时采用FloTrac/Vigileo心输出量监测系统记录SVV、CO、SV、CI。SVV、CO、SV、CI与羟乙基淀粉输注量行Spearman等级相关分析。结果SVV与单肺通气患者血容量变化呈负相关,CI、CO、SV与单肺通气患者血容量变化呈正相关(P〈0.05),相关系数(r)分别为rSVV:-0.249,rCO:0.570,rSV:0.552,rCI:0.550。结论SVV与单肺通气患者血容量变化相关性差,不能准确反映容量的变化。Objective To evaluate the correlation between stroke volume variation (SVV) and blood vol- ume during one-lung ventilation (OLV).Methods Forty ASA li male patients, aged 50-60 yr, with body mass index 20-25 kg/m2 , scheduled for elective resection of esophageal cancer, were studied. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 4μg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Double-lumen tube was inserted. Correct position was verified by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The patients were mechanically ventilated (V.r 8 ml/kg, RR 15 bpm, I:E 1:2). 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 was infused intravenously at a rate of 0.67 ml·kg^-1 .min^-1 starting from 30 min of OLV. SVV, cardiac output (CO) , SV and cardiac index (CI) were mon- itored and recorded using the FloTrae/Vigileo (Edwards Lifesciences, USA) system before HES was infused and when the dose of HES reached 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 ml/kg. Spearman rank sum correlation coefficient was used to analyze the data. Results SVV was negatively correlated with the blood volume during OLV and the correlation coefficient was rsvv = - 0.249. CI, CO and SV were positively correlated with the blood volume during OLV and the correlation coefficients were rco = 0.570, rsv = 0.552 and rcj = 0.550, respectively. Conclusion SVV is poorly correlated with the blood volume during OLV and can not reflect the blood volume accurately.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222