检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《经济经纬》2013年第1期22-26,共5页Economic Survey
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(08&ZD022);中南财经政法大学研究生创新基金课题(2011B0809)
摘 要:为了解我国新农业补贴制度的作用机理和政策效果,笔者构建农户行为模型进行分析。结果表明,农业生产与农户要素配置密切相关,而农户要素配置取决于农业比较利益;农业投入补贴和农产品价格补贴促进农业生产,而收入补贴并无生产效应;在政策效果上,价格补贴具有稳定的产出效果,而投入补贴的产出效果与农业要素价格和农户非农经营利润率有关;此外,投入补贴和价格补贴都具有积极的收入效应。我国当前农业补贴采取的直补模式使补贴的重心落入收入范畴,对农业生产的促进作用甚小。我国农业补贴的理性目标应该是生产导向而非收入导向,补贴结构和方式应据此改变。A household behavior model is constructed to explain the mechanism and effect of China' s new agricultural subsidies. The Analysis shows that agricultural production are closely related to the production elements allocation of farmers, and production elements allocation depend on the comparative advantage of agriculture. As a matter of policy in effect, price subsidies has the stable output effect, and output effect of investment subsidies is closely related to agricultural factor prices and farmers non-farm business profit mar- gins. In addition, both investment subsidies and income subsidies have positive income effect. The direct payment pattern of China' s current agricultural subsidies makes the policy focus fall into income category, so it hardly promotes agricultural production. Rational goal of China' s agricultural subsidies should be production-oriented rather than income-oriented and subsidy structure and way should change accordingly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70