基于环境政策规制绩效的波特假说验证——以江西省重点调查产业为例  

Retest on Porter Hypothesis Based on Environmental Policy Regulation Performance——A Key Industrial Survey in Jiangxi Province

作　　者：万建香[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学信息管理学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《经济经纬》2013年第1期115-119,共5页Economic Survey

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(71063006);国家软科学项目(2012GXS4D089);"赣鄱555工程"领军人才培养计划项目(赣组字[2011]64号);2011大学生创新创业训练计划项目NO20111042135)

摘　　要：波特假说认为环境规制给产业造成的负担能够通过技术创新加以弥补从而提高产业绩效。为验证波特假说的存在性,笔者采用2002年～2008年江西省重点调查行业面板数据,考察环境政策规制的产业竞争能力、创新能力和环保能力绩效。实证表明,市场型污染排放征税政策满足波特假说,而行政命令型环境治理建设项目"三同时"政策不满足波特假说;污染排放征税关于产品销售率、流动资产周转率、专利批准量的弹性分别为1.33、0.26、0.97,关于废水、废气、SO2、烟尘排放强度的弹性分别为-1.47、-1.21、-1.37、-2.96,关于电力、柴油、总能源消耗强度的弹性分别为-1.26、-1.58、-1.93。Porter hypothesis argues that the burden of environment regulation on industry can be made up by technology innovation, thus enhancing the industrial performance. To retest Porter hypothesis, this paper empirically tests on industrial competitiveness, innovation capacity and environment protection capability of environmental policy regulation with 2001-2008 panel data of Jiangxi. It is found that pollution tax policy, being the representative of market environmental policy, satisfies Porter hypothesis, while environment construc- tion policy, being the representative of administrative policy, does not satisfy it. Furthermore, by measurement and comparison of per- formance elastic of environmental policies. It is proved that market environmental policy is easier to meet ＂ Porter hypothesis＂ than ad- ministrative one.

关 键 词：环境政策 规制绩效 波特假说 重点调查产业 

分 类 号：F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]