检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宇钰[1] 刘建军[1] 马长欣[1] 任军辉[2]
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学林学院,陕西杨陵712100 [2]西藏职业技术学院,西藏拉萨850030
出 处:《西北林学院学报》2013年第1期67-72,共6页Journal of Northwest Forestry University
基 金:国家林业局公益性行业专项(200904004)
摘 要:以安康市城市生态系统为对象,利用能值理论和生态足迹模型,计算和分析了安康市2004—2008年区域发展模式下区域生态足迹的需求和区域生态承载力,并进行了可持续发展评价。结果表明:安康市2004—2008年人均能值生态足迹分别为11.90、11.83、11.59、11.57、11.40hm2,人均能值生态承载力分别为4.28、4.69、4.00、4.44、4.89hm2,可持续性评价指数分别为0.74、0.72、0.74、0.72、0.70,人均能值生态足迹大于人均能值生态承载力,出现生态赤字,生态安全性较差,社会发展中生态贡献巨大,可持续发展水平不高。Taking the municipal ecosystem of Ankang as object,by combining the energy value theory and the eco- logical footprint models together, the amounts of ecological carrying capacity and the demands of ecological foot- prints between 2004 to 2008 were calculated,and an assessment was conducted in the view of regional sustainable development. In the years of 2004 to 2008, the energy-based ecological footprints were 11.90 hm2, 11.83 hm2, 11.59 hm2 , 11.57 hm2 ,and 11.40 hm2 per capita,respectively. The energy-based ecological carrying capacities were 4.28 hm2 ,4.69 hm2 ,4.00 hm2 ,4.44 hm2 ,and 4.89 hm2 per capita,respectively. The sustainability energy indices were 0. 74,0. 72. 0. 74,0. 72, and 0.70, respectively. The energy-based ecological footprint was beyond the carrying capacity,and turned out ecological deficit, resulting in poor ecological safety, which meant the consumption of re- sources was highly beyond the supply of the resources.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16